Sunday, September 11, 2016

YOUTUBE AD POLICY: CENSORSHIP OR GOOD BUSINESS PRACTICE? Advertising policy for content producers under fire.



               (September 2016): Remember when the internet was like a wide-open frontier, where anyone with an idea and a computer could start multi-million dollar ventures from nothing?  It was a “Wild West” of sorts, with people staking their claim to niches and topics with no rules and seemingly infinite potential. Internet stars popped up out of nowhere with nothing but videos of raw talent, unrestrained vocabularies, and possibly the video of someone being injured.  These internet “celebrities” mostly came from the website YouTube. Eventually, some individuals became known as YouTubers (some vloggers fit into this category as well) and commanded thousands if not millions of subscribers to their YouTube channels.  YouTubers were given a rare opportunity to earn revenue from their popularity in the form of advertising on their videos provided by Google.  

For example, at the end of August there was a firestorm of online protests by people known as YouTubers and vloggers as well as other creators of online content about the media giant’s enforcement of their advertising policy of removing the opportunity for advertising revenue from videos that are “not advertiser friendly.”  Although the policy has been selectively and / or inadequately enforced ever since 2012, YouTube emails detailing YouTuber videos whose advertising had been pulled for content, and that the account holder can appeal the process.  Social media has been in the news as of late for such controversies as the vague line between testimonial and advertising of products by celebrities on Instagram, and Facebook putting forth yet another algorithm change attempt to crack down on click-bait headlines. Right now, The YouTube algorithms are focusing on the descriptions and tags of videos, searching for keywords that will flag a video as being “not advertiser friendly.”  However, the enforcement of the policy is unpredictable and unevenly imposed to say the least; one video that breaks all the rules with ads still active could be displayed on the same screen as someone’s commentary on a news event that has been demonetized as a result of YouTube’s algorithm flagging it as a video that contains “profanity and vulgar language.”

What does this mean to the average person who watches videos on YouTube? ...[READ MORE]

No comments:

Post a Comment